Jun 5, 2014 · Is there a good resource online with a collection of grammars for some of the major parsing algorithms (LL(1), LR(1), LR(0), LALR(1))? I've found many individual grammars that fall into …

@MehdiCharife if your grammar has a FIRST/FIRST or FIRST/FOLLOW conflict anywhere, then it is not LL (1). It does not matter how far you can progress through a given string before the conflict …

Dec 1, 2013 · Can anyone explain to me how FIRST and FOLLOW should be used in LL (1) grammar? I understand that they are used for syntax table construction, but I don't understand how.

Jan 1, 2017 · (I am spending the holiday time on some language theory. Excuse me if this is a naive question.) According to here: LL grammars, particularly LL(1) grammars, are of great practical …

Aug 20, 2011 · I have a grammar and I can check whether or not is is LL(1). However, is there any way to check if the language generated by the grammar is LL(1)? And what exactly is the difference …

May 31, 2022 · I have to produce an LL1 grammar that covers the IF, IF-ELSE, IF - ELSE IF - ELSE condition for a C program. I was doing the follow and I wasn't able to solve the recursions so I …

May 12, 2011 · At a high level, the difference between LL parsing and LR parsing is that LL parsers begin at the start symbol and try to apply productions to arrive at the target string, whereas LR …

Dec 4, 2015 · Even when you factor out the if-then part as a common factor rule? After that, matching that rule will match the if-then part, which is in itself correct. Then it could try to parse the optional …

Mar 1, 2013 · I have the following grammar: S → a S b S | b S a S | ε Since I'm trying to write a small compiler for it, I'd like to make it LL(1). I see that there seems to be a FIRST/FOLLOW conflict here, …

Nov 14, 2010 · Something being LR does not mean that the parse tree with be identical to the inverse LL parse tree, and the thus parser will not necessarily use the productions in the opposite order. What it …